Ugh! |
“Every election is determined by the people who show up”- Larry J. Sabato
Hey, there. I'm listening to David Rudder's Madness as I type this post. Gypsy's The Sinking Ship is in the queue.
I try not to discuss politics. Like topics of religion and sexuality, some people are overly passionate about their politics, and can be unreasonable, volatile or prone to idiotic outbursts if you were to present a dissenting view.
For some people, it’s this sense of
blind loyalty bordering on reverence towards political leaders and their
parties. You’re either UNC or PNM, there’s no in-between (sorry, COP); if UNC
is in power and does something good, you had best not like it if you support
the PNM and vice versa. And I’m not even getting into race and politics.
I remember back when Kamla had
unveiled the People’s Partnership some years ago, I had commented to a
classmate that I thought it was a good idea, and I looked forward to what she
had to offer going into the 2010 General Elections.
“So because you went ah Hindu
school, you hadda vote for she?” he asked.
His implication was obvious. I was
shocked that someone whom I had regarded a friend would stoop so low and throw
that in my face. If anything, my years in Hindu school left me with, among
other things, an addiction to parsad.
Anyway, that was one of many
interactions I've had that scarred me. I vowed to not discuss politics with any
and anybody. That was then, this is now.
With the 2015 General Elections fast
approaching, unless there’s another SOE, of course, I am faced with the
decision of which party I should vote for. Were it up to me, I would stay home
on Sept. 7th with a nice book and listen to Florence + The Machine.
I would remain separate and apart
from the nonsense and there would be none of that repulsive electoral ink
staining my finger; a win-win, if you ask me. But, you know, voting is my civic
duty and all that jazz, so I have to weigh my options.
In 2010, I voted for Kamla and the
People’s Partnership. She had convinced me. I wanted change. I did not want
Manning as Prime Minister for another five years. The PNM had been in power
long enough and I wanted to see someone else in the driver’s seat. I liked
their manifesto. I liked the double entendre of their slogan. I wanted to rise
too. Plus, I was convinced that the candidate for my area had stolen money from
the last organization he had been a part of. So, hell yes, I voted for Kamla
and the PP.
The last five years have been, well....
I am literally wracking my brain. I want to speak of the successes that she has
had, of the development the country has undergone, of where I see the country
heading were she to be given an additional five years. But, all I can think of
is the disappointment. And how hard it is to determine what went right.
From the creation of Government
Ministries all willy-nilly to the revolving door that was her Cabinet to the
characters that formed a part of said Cabinet. I think of Section 34; Volney; Glenn
on the plane; Chandresh in the car-park; Life Sport; Anil; despicable character
assassinations; the list goes on and on and on. It was a circus, bobol and scandal at every turn, un fracaso total.
I think Kamla is aware of the public’s
perception and has been doing everything in her power to sway the voters to her
side. It’s reflected in her campaign.
All over the Internet, there are
little ads, each signed with “Kamla 2015” in the colours of the national flag,
depicting a photo and what she stands for. From the requisite “interacting with
children” (Manning used to kiss babies) to her and Gregs, hugging for Family
Values.
On YouTube, the “Why So Growley,
Rowley?” and “The Gruesome Twosome” ads have disrupted many a streaming of The
Wendy Williams Show’s segments. And we shall not speak about that televised masturdebate.
The emails are another thing. Whilst
I’m mostly hurt that she referred to me as ‘Friend’ as opposed to ‘Garvin’, ‘Garvs’,
‘Nephew’ or ‘Son-Son’ and confused as to how she got my email address in the
first place, I get what she was going for.
She bashes Rowley, as usual, but she
also reiterates the successes of the last five years and lists her 2020 plans,
however, vague. Sure, it’s mostly backfired (have you seen Facebook?), but her
intent was clear. I might have also downloaded the 2020 Plans.
What her campaign has done is made
me genuinely sit and wonder if she’s deserving of my vote. With any Government,
there's the good, the bad and the downright scandalous. It’s unfortunate that 'The Bad' and 'The Downright Scandalous' have overshadowed 'The Good'.
Then, there’s Rowley. I find his
campaign to be the opposite of Kamla’s. On the one hand, his is ‘meet with his
supporters on a grassroots level and engage them’, whereas hers is more ‘bombard
the electorate with facts, promises, photos and invasive emails’.
I feel like I’m experiencing ‘The Taming
of the Raging Bull’. The softer, more gregarious side of Rowley is almost
enough to make me forget about his perceived arrogance, the Vote of No Confidence,
Vernella’s accusatory filth, and his allegedly poor pick-up lines ("You looking
rosy." Really?).
On the other hand, from what I've
heard at rallies and read in the newspapers, it’s all mudslinging and
reiterations of past transgressions from him. It’s obvious that he’s playing
with the majority of the population’s disdain and ire over what has transpired
over the past five years.
But, aside from Late O’ Clock News
and their reporting his plan to give Tiidas to toddlers, and his incredulity
over Kamla wanting to build a bridge from Toco to Tobago, I'm yet to hear anything of his plans for the next five years. Maybe, they flew over my head or Google has failed me.
Should you have any links you wish to share, do so, please. I’m all for learning
more.
At this point, I feel like I’ll be
voting for the lesser of two evils come Sept. 7th. Kamla has a 2020
plan, but her campaign reeks of desperation and I cannot forget. Rowley can’t be any worse than
Kamla, right? He seems to be more than capable of working for the people. Ugh!
I envy those who know exactly where they’ll put their X.
I should forego the back and forth
and simply follow the words of Mark Twain: “Politicians and diapers must be
changed often, and for the same reason”.
Until the next post!
Dear Garvs, I definitely know who will get my vote! You can read more here. http://pnmtnt.org/index.php/policy/pnm-draft-policy-statement-2015.html Yes it is a draft document, but it clearly addresses the issues of agriculture, energy, education, health services and the country´s infrastructure. I am hard pressed to name two things that the Kamla administration promised in 2010 and have in fact fulfilled. Her house of glass now lies in a pile of shards. So with that in mind, roll on Sept 07.
ReplyDeleteDra. Thank you for the document, and for addressing me as 'Garvs'. Roll on Sept 07, indeed.
ReplyDelete